1. Skills load once in core at session start; the cached outcome is
reused across core and surfaced to TUI via SessionConfigured.
2. TUI detects explicit skill selections, and core injects the matching
SKILL.md content into the turn when a selected skill is present.
- Make Config.model optional and centralize default-selection logic in
ModelsManager, including a default_model helper (with
codex-auto-balanced when available) so sessions now carry an explicit
chosen model separate from the base config.
- Resolve `model` once in `core` and `tui` from config. Then store the
state of it on other structs.
- Move refreshing models to be before resolving the default model
Make sure that config writes preserve comments and order of configs by
utilizing the ConfigEditsBuilder in core.
Tested by running a real example and made sure that nothing in the
config file changes other than the configs to edit.
helpful in the future if we want more granularity for requesting
escalated permissions:
e.g when running in readonly sandbox, model can request to escalate to a
sandbox that allows writes
This PR attempts to solve two problems by introducing a
`AbsolutePathBuf` type with a special deserializer:
- `AbsolutePathBuf` attempts to be a generally useful abstraction, as it
ensures, by constructing, that it represents a value that is an
absolute, normalized path, which is a stronger guarantee than an
arbitrary `PathBuf`.
- Values in `config.toml` that can be either an absolute or relative
path should be resolved against the folder containing the `config.toml`
in the relative path case. This PR makes this easy to support: the main
cost is ensuring `AbsolutePathBufGuard` is used inside
`deserialize_config_toml_with_base()`.
While `AbsolutePathBufGuard` may seem slightly distasteful because it
relies on thread-local storage, this seems much cleaner to me than using
than my various experiments with
https://docs.rs/serde/latest/serde/de/trait.DeserializeSeed.html.
Further, since the `deserialize()` method from the `Deserialize` trait
is not async, we do not really have to worry about the deserialization
work being spread across multiple threads in a way that would interfere
with `AbsolutePathBufGuard`.
To start, this PR introduces the use of `AbsolutePathBuf` in
`OtelTlsConfig`. Note how this simplifies `otel_provider.rs` because it
no longer requires `settings.codex_home` to be threaded through.
Furthermore, this sets us up better for a world where multiple
`config.toml` files from different folders could be loaded and then
merged together, as the absolutifying of the paths must be done against
the correct parent folder.
Introduce a new codex-tui2 crate that re-exports the existing
interactive TUI surface and delegates run_main directly to codex-tui.
This keeps behavior identical while giving tui2 its own crate for future
viewport work.
Wire the codex CLI to select the frontend via the tui2 feature flag.
When the merged CLI overrides include features.tui2=true (e.g. via
--enable tui2), interactive runs are routed through
codex_tui2::run_main; otherwise they continue to use the original
codex_tui::run_main.
Register Feature::Tui2 in the core feature registry and add the tui2
crate and dependency entries so the new frontend builds alongside the
existing TUI.
This is a stub that only wires up the feature flag for this.
<img width="619" height="364" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4893f030-932f-471e-a443-63fe6b5d8ed9"
/>
This is a step towards removing the need to know `model` when
constructing config. We firstly don't need to know `model_info` and just
respect if the user has already set it. Next step, we don't need to know
`model` unless the user explicitly set it in `config.toml`
# External (non-OpenAI) Pull Request Requirements
Before opening this Pull Request, please read the dedicated
"Contributing" markdown file or your PR may be closed:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/docs/contributing.md
If your PR conforms to our contribution guidelines, replace this text
with a detailed and high quality description of your changes.
Include a link to a bug report or enhancement request.
Currently, we only show the “don’t ask again for commands that start
with…” option when a command is immediately flagged as needing approval.
However, there is another case where we ask for approval: When a command
is initially auto-approved to run within sandbox, but it fails to run
inside sandbox, we would like to attempt to retry running outside of
sandbox. This will require a prompt to the user.
This PR addresses this latter case
Issue #7661 revealed that users are confused by deprecation warnings
like:
> `tools.web_search` is deprecated. Use `web_search_request` instead.
This message misleadingly suggests renaming the config key from
`web_search` to `web_search_request`, when the actual required change is
to **move and rename the configuration from the `[tools]` section to the
`[features]` section**.
This PR clarifies the warning messages and documentation to make it
clear that deprecated `[tools]` configurations should be moved to
`[features]`. Changes made:
- Updated deprecation warning format in `codex-rs/core/src/codex.rs:520`
to include `[features].` prefix
- Updated corresponding test expectations in
`codex-rs/core/tests/suite/deprecation_notice.rs:39`
- Improved documentation in `docs/config.md` to clarify upfront that
`[tools]` options are deprecated in favor of `[features]`
# External (non-OpenAI) Pull Request Requirements
Before opening this Pull Request, please read the dedicated
"Contributing" markdown file or your PR may be closed:
https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/docs/contributing.md
If your PR conforms to our contribution guidelines, replace this text
with a detailed and high quality description of your changes.
Include a link to a bug report or enhancement request.
## Summary
This PR is heavily based on #4017, which contains the core logic for the
fix. To reduce the risk, we are first introducing it only on windows. We
can then expand to wsl / other environments as needed, and then tackle
net new files.
## Testing
- [x] added unit tests in apply-patch
- [x] add integration tests to apply_patch_cli.rs
---------
Co-authored-by: Chase Naples <Cnaples79@gmail.com>
- This PR wires `with_remote_overrides` and make the
`construct_model_families` an async function
- Moves getting model family a level above to keep the function `sync`
- Updates the tests to local, offline, and `sync` helper for model
families
- Introduce `with_remote_overrides` and update
`refresh_available_models`
- Put `auth_manager` instead of `auth_mode` on `models_manager`
- Remove `ShellType` and `ReasoningLevel` to use already existing
structs
The caller should decide whether wrapping the policy in `Arc<RwLock>` is
necessary. This should make https://github.com/openai/codex/pull/7609 a
bit smoother.
- `exec_policy_for()` -> `load_exec_policy_for_features()`
- introduce `load_exec_policy()` that does not take `Features` as an arg
- both return `Result<Policy, ExecPolicyError>` instead of
Result<Arc<RwLock<Policy>>, ExecPolicyError>`
This simplifies the tests as they have no need for `Arc<RwLock>`.
- Inline response recording during streaming: `run_turn` now records
items as they arrive instead of building a `ProcessedResponseItem` list
and post‑processing via `process_items`.
- Simplify turn handling: `handle_output_item_done` returns the
follow‑up signal + optional tool future; `needs_follow_up` is set only
there, and in‑flight tool futures are drained once at the end (errors
logged, no extra state writes).
- Flattened stream loop: removed `process_items` indirection and the
extra output queue
- - Tests: relaxed `tool_parallelism::tool_results_grouped` to allow any
completion order while still requiring matching call/output IDs.
**Change**: Seatbelt now allows file-ioctl on /dev/ttys[0-9]+ even
without the sandbox extension so pre-created PTYs remain interactive
(Python REPL, shells).
**Risk**: A seatbelted process that already holds a PTY fd (including
one it shouldn’t) could issue tty ioctls like TIOCSTI or termios changes
on that fd. This doesn’t allow opening new PTYs or reading/writing them;
it only broadens ioctl capability on existing fds.
**Why acceptable**: We already hand the child its PTY for interactive
use; restoring ioctls is required for isatty() and prompts to work. The
attack requires being given or inheriting a sensitive PTY fd; by design
we don’t hand untrusted processes other users’ PTYs (we don't hand them
any PTYs actually), so the practical exposure is limited to the PTY
intentionally allocated for the session.
**Validation**:
Running
```
start a python interpreter and keep it running
```
Followed by:
* `calculate 1+1 using it` -> works as expected
* `Use this Python session to run the command just fix in
/Users/jif/code/codex/codex-rs` -> does not work as expected
## Refactor of the `execpolicy` crate
To illustrate why we need this refactor, consider an agent attempting to
run `apple | rm -rf ./`. Suppose `apple` is allowed by `execpolicy`.
Before this PR, `execpolicy` would consider `apple` and `pear` and only
render one rule match: `Allow`. We would skip any heuristics checks on
`rm -rf ./` and immediately approve `apple | rm -rf ./` to run.
To fix this, we now thread a `fallback` evaluation function into
`execpolicy` that runs when no `execpolicy` rules match a given command.
In our example, we would run `fallback` on `rm -rf ./` and prevent
`apple | rm -rf ./` from being run without approval.
