## Why This continues the `codex-tools` migration by moving another passive tool-definition layer out of `codex-core`. After `ResponsesApiTool` and the lower-level schema adapters moved into `codex-tools`, `core/src/client_common.rs` was still owning `ToolSpec` and the web-search request wire types even though they are serialized data models rather than runtime orchestration. Keeping those types in `codex-core` makes the crate boundary look smaller than it really is and leaves non-runtime tool-shape code coupled to core. ## What changed - moved `ToolSpec`, `ResponsesApiWebSearchFilters`, and `ResponsesApiWebSearchUserLocation` into `codex-rs/tools/src/tool_spec.rs` - added focused unit tests in `codex-rs/tools/src/tool_spec_tests.rs` for: - `ToolSpec::name()` - web-search config conversions - `ToolSpec` serialization for `web_search` and `tool_search` - kept `codex-rs/tools/src/lib.rs` exports-only by re-exporting the new module from `lib.rs` - reduced `core/src/client_common.rs` to a compatibility shim that re-exports the extracted tool-spec types for current core call sites - updated `core/src/tools/spec_tests.rs` to consume the extracted web-search types directly from `codex-tools` - updated `codex-rs/tools/README.md` so the crate contract reflects that `codex-tools` now owns the passive tool-spec request models in addition to the lower-level Responses API structs ## Test plan - `cargo test -p codex-tools` - `cargo test -p codex-core --lib tools::spec::` - `cargo test -p codex-core --lib client_common::` - `just fix -p codex-tools -p codex-core` - `just argument-comment-lint` ## References - #15923 - #15928 - #15944 - #15953 - #16031
3.0 KiB
codex-tools
codex-tools is intended to become the home for tool-related code that is
shared across multiple crates and does not need to stay coupled to
codex-core.
Today this crate is intentionally small. It currently owns the shared tool
schema and Responses API tool primitives that no longer need to live in
core/src/tools/spec.rs or core/src/client_common.rs:
JsonSchemaAdditionalPropertiesToolDefinitionToolSpecResponsesApiToolFreeformToolFreeformToolFormatToolSearchOutputToolResponsesApiWebSearchFiltersResponsesApiWebSearchUserLocationResponsesApiNamespaceResponsesApiNamespaceToolparse_tool_input_schema()parse_dynamic_tool()parse_mcp_tool()mcp_call_tool_result_output_schema()tool_definition_to_responses_api_tool()dynamic_tool_to_responses_api_tool()mcp_tool_to_responses_api_tool()mcp_tool_to_deferred_responses_api_tool()
That extraction is the first step in a longer migration. The goal is not to
move all of core/src/tools into this crate in one shot. Instead, the plan is
to peel off reusable pieces in reviewable increments while keeping
compatibility-sensitive orchestration in codex-core until the surrounding
boundaries are ready.
Vision
Over time, this crate should hold tool-facing primitives that are shared by multiple consumers, for example:
- schema and spec data models
- tool input/output parsing helpers
- tool metadata and compatibility shims that do not depend on
codex-core - other narrowly scoped utility code that multiple crates need
The corresponding non-goals are just as important:
- do not move
codex-coreorchestration here prematurely - do not pull
Session/TurnContext/ approval flow / runtime execution logic into this crate unless those dependencies have first been split into stable shared interfaces - do not turn this crate into a grab-bag for unrelated helper code
Migration approach
The expected migration shape is:
- Move low-coupling tool primitives here.
- Switch non-core consumers to depend on
codex-toolsdirectly. - Leave compatibility-sensitive adapters in
codex-corewhile downstream call sites are updated. - Only extract higher-level tool infrastructure after the crate boundaries are clear and independently testable.
That means it is normal for codex-core to temporarily re-export types or
helpers from codex-tools during the transition.
Crate conventions
This crate should start with stricter structure than core/src/tools so it
stays easy to grow:
src/lib.rsshould remain exports-only.- Business logic should live in named module files such as
foo.rs. - Unit tests for
foo.rsshould live in a siblingfoo_tests.rs. - The implementation file should wire tests with:
#[cfg(test)]
#[path = "foo_tests.rs"]
mod tests;
If this crate starts accumulating code that needs runtime state from
codex-core, that is a sign to revisit the extraction boundary before adding
more here.