Chore: add cmd related info to exec approval request (#9659)

### Summary
We now rely purely on `item/commandExecution/requestApproval` item to
render pending approval in VSCE and app. With v2 approach, it does not
include the actual cmd that it is attempting and therefore we can only
use `proposedExecpolicyAmendment` to render which can be incomplete.

### Reproduce
* Add `prefix_rule(pattern=["echo"], decision="prompt")` to your
`~/.codex/rules.default.rules`.
* Ask to `Run  echo "approval-test" please` in VSCE or app. 
* The pending approval protal does show up but with no content

#### Example screenshot
<img width="3434" height="3648" alt="Screenshot 2026-01-21 at 8 23
25 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/75644837-21f1-40f8-8b02-858d361ff817"
/>

#### Sample output
```
  {"method":"item/commandExecution/requestApproval","id":0,"params":{
    "threadId":"019be439-5a90-7600-a7ea-2d2dcc50302a",
    "turnId":"0",
    "itemId":"call_usgnQ4qEX5U9roNdjT7fPzhb",
    "reason":"`/bin/zsh -lc 'echo \"testing\"'` requires approval by policy",
    "proposedExecpolicyAmendment":null
  }}

```

### Fix
Inlude `command` string, `cwd` and `command_actions` in
`CommandExecutionRequestApprovalParams` so that consumers can display
the correct command instead of relying on exec policy output.

codex-rs/app-server-test-client/src/main.rs

@@ -842,6 +842,9 @@ impl CodexClient {
             turn_id,
             item_id,
             reason,
+            command,
+            cwd,
+            command_actions,
             proposed_execpolicy_amendment,
         } = params;
 
@@ -851,6 +854,17 @@ impl CodexClient {
         if let Some(reason) = reason.as_deref() {
             println!("< reason: {reason}");
         }
+        if let Some(command) = command.as_deref() {
+            println!("< command: {command}");
+        }
+        if let Some(cwd) = cwd.as_ref() {
+            println!("< cwd: {}", cwd.display());
+        }
+        if let Some(command_actions) = command_actions.as_ref()
+            && !command_actions.is_empty()
+        {
+            println!("< command actions: {command_actions:?}");
+        }
         if let Some(execpolicy_amendment) = proposed_execpolicy_amendment.as_ref() {
             println!("< proposed execpolicy amendment: {execpolicy_amendment:?}");
         }